 |
| Up (2009) |
There is a reason why I never trust reception of a Pixar
film, that reason being the subject of this; Up. When the reviews first rolled
around for this film all I read was, “masterpiece” or “the best of Pixar” which
is what I hear from every newly released Pixar – bar the horrifically beaten
Cars and the god-awful sequel. Sadly, the hype has stuck and people genuinely
like this movie, why...? There are moments in life when you come to realise
that the majority and known truth is right.
If the whole world thinks the world is flat, it is flat. But movies like Up and Toy Story 3 come along and get the
slap of approval and blind nostalgia love like there is no tomorrow, you just
simply can’t believe opinions cannot
be wrong. Nostalgia is one of the best feelings you can have, everyone seems to
be grabbing on to their old memories of Toy Story and pretending they haven’t
become cynical assholes. So why is Up crap?
It’s weird, I mean really, really weird. Law #1:
Realism
+
Weird
=
Good
Weird
+
Weird
=
Bad
That’s exactly Up’s problem. It has a great,
touching idea, than just grabs onto some random crap and everyone feels the
need to eat it up – pun intended. Let me explain how Law #1 plays a role. A man
falling in love with a women and planning big, then never reaching those dreams
and happiness sparks a lust for life and a mid-life crisis (old-life crisis?) –
good, realist and made for the best scenes of Pixar in it’s About Schmidt-ish
way (but for kids). Now you add in a floating house – crazy, but its okay, they
had a good opening. We have a good movie so far, perhaps the best of Pixar and
one of the best animations wait, don’t forget to add a talking dog and a giant
fictional bird and an army of talking dogs and a giant military zeppelin and an
aging celebrity living in South America living with the army of talking dogs.
WHAT?!
We had a beautiful, touching movie that was in
the running for the GREATEST animation ever, and you add an army of talking
dogs? It’s as if they just wanted to make the balloon idea and had no idea what
else to add, but seriously, if you were in a room discussing what happens next,
would you not laugh at the idea of an army of talking dogs coming into the
equation, would you not fight the group of idiots who actually push this idea
forward, would you not jump right out that room’s window falling from that
presumably high building instead of allowing a team of formerly brilliant
writers to add TALKING DOGS to the new film? I know it’s a kid movie and you
need to have some unrealistic mush because the real world is too sad and
depressing, but that’s the whole point of the floating house hanging on some balloons.
It’s because of all the film’s emotion, beauty and just pure realism shown in
such an immaculate way (I’m talking about that letterbox scene, what a scene! )
are just plain and simply thrown out the window for when a plot so ridiculous
it wouldn’t show up in the worst of films, but joins the lines with such films
as, “Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.” Just think of it for a second,
“Old Man conquers the army of talking dogs while in a flying house.”
“Old Man conquers the army of talking dogs while in a flying house.”
Note: Long sentences = irony.
“Yeah sure,” says the mindless Pixar fanatic, “But
Up is a heartfelt adventure impeccably crafted and told with wit and
depth...
Blah
Blah
Blah.”
Yes, the first thirty minutes is just pure gold,
which is why this isn’t the worst movie ever, but it’s the last hour which is
why this is not a brilliant movie, or even a good movie.
5/10
